TECHNOPOLICE

    • Register
    • Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups

    Transparence et audit des technologies de surveillance policière

    Stratégies et formats de mobilisation
    1
    1
    44
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • felix
      felix last edited by felix

      C'était une demande de la lettre ouverte publiée dans le cadre des municipales à Marseille (et qui peut d'ailleurs être reprise pour d'autres villes ;). Sur ce sujet, après Oakland notamment, New York vient à son tour de se doter d'un organisme de ce type :

      Yesterday the New York City Council passed the Public Oversight of Surveillance Technology (POST) Act, a law that enables public oversight of surveillance technologies used by the New York Police Department. The POST Act will require the police to publish documents explaining their use of surveillance technologies, accept public comments about them, and provide a final surveillance impact and use policy to the public. EPIC has worked for years to focus public attention on the privacy impact of emerging surveillance technologies, and has pursued open government cases against the FBI and other law enforcement agencies to release information about cell site simulators and other surveillance technologies. EPIC has recently launched a project to track and review algorithms used in the criminal justice system.
      https://epic.org/2020/06/new-york-city-passes-new-surve.html

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • First post
        Last post